›  Uncategorized

A Nuclear Triad Is Obsolete In The Age Of Transformation; The False Logic Is That Nuclear Weapons, Missiles, Or Bombs Somehow Protect Anyone From Anything - This Is The End Of The Toxic Heavy Metal Poison Nuclear Age

Posted by 0x000216
A Nuclear Triad Is Obsolete In The Age Of Transformation; The False Logic Is That Nuclear Weapons, Missiles, Or Bombs Somehow Protect Anyone From Anything - This Is The End Of The Toxic Heavy Metal Poison Nuclear Age

PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY SHORT FILM; MILLENNIAL'S ANSWER A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT NUCLEAR WEAPONS, NUCLEAR BOMBS


Nukebusters Short Film Contest 1st Prize Winner, Student Category
https://youtu.be/3D936QjnBgc 4 min.

Ask people around you these questions;

How many nuclear weapons are there in the world? THOUSANDS!

How many nuclear bombs has the military dropped on the US from bombers accidentally? 2, but luckily they did not go off, but one got VERY close, and it was 250 times bigger than the one dropped on Japan.

How many nuclear weapons would it take to destroy America and put it back into the Stone Age? Just 1, via the EMP Pulse effect.

How much is America spending on nuclear weapons EVERY HOUR? 2.2 million dollars

HOW MANY NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE ENOUGH TO DESTROY THE WORLD MANY TIMES OVER?


There are nine countries that possess nuclear weapons today, including:

(1) Russia with approximately                                                    7,500
(2) the United States with approximately                                   7,200
(3) France with fewer than                                                                 300
(4) China with approximately                                                            250
(5) the United Kingdom with fewer than                                           215
(6) Pakistan with                                                                                 120
(7) India with                                                                                       90-110
(8) Israel, which is believed to possess 80 weapons; and
(9) North Korea, which is estimated to possess enough plutonium for up to 10 fission bombs. -
See more at: http://www.globalzero.org/get-the-facts/FAQs#sthash.7Msd9ePs.dpuf

“The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it.
Martin Luther King, Jr.
 It only takes setting off one nuclear weapon in the US in the right place, to destroy an entire country, such as the US, and possibly the world via an EMP pulse. This article explains and goes into detail about how and why this is true, and why all nuclear bombs must be dismantled and abolished. 

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Atomic Bombing Of Japan: 70 Year Anniversary - PM Abe Promises To Ban Nuclear Bombs Via UN
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2015/08/hiroshima-and-nagasaki-atomic-bombing.html

The citizens of Japan know and understand very well why all nuclear weapons must be abolished and dismantled.

WHAT IS A NUCLEAR TRIAD?


Wikipedia; "A nuclear triad refers to the nuclear weapons delivery of a strategic nuclear arsenal which consists of three components, traditionally strategic bombers, intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), and submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs). The purpose of having a three-branched nuclear capability is to significantly reduce the possibility that an enemy could destroy all of a nation's nuclear forces in afirst-strike attack; this, in turn, ensures a credible threat of a second strike, and thus increases a nation's nuclear deterrence.[1][2][3]

While traditional nuclear strategy holds that a nuclear triad provides the best level of deterrence from attack, in reality, most nuclear powers do not have the military budget to sustain a full triad. Only the United States and Russia have maintained nuclear triads for most of the nuclear age.[3]Both the US and the Soviet Union composed their triads along the same lines, including the following components:

Bomber aircraft capable of delivering nuclear bombs (carrier-based or land-based; usually armed with long-range missiles).[1]

Land-based missiles (MRBMs or ICBMs).[1][3]

Ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs). Nuclear missiles launched from ships or submarines.[1][3] Although in early years the US Navy sea leg was carrier aircraft based with a very short period using sub launched cruise missiles such as the Regulus before SLBMs were ready to be deployed.

The triad also gives the commander in chief the flexibility to use different types of weapons for the appropriate strike while also preserving a reserve of nuclear armaments theoretically safe from a counter-force strike:

ICBMs allow for a long-range strike launched from a controlled or friendly environment at a lower cost per delivered warhead and easiest targeting from a surveyed geographic location.[4] If launched from a fixed position, such as a missile silo, they are vulnerable to a first strike, though their interception once aloft is substantially difficult,[1][3] Some ICBMs are either rail or road mobile. Medium-range ballistic missiles and ground-launched cruise missiles were also assigned for strategic targets based in nations closer to the potential confrontation, but were eventually forbidden by arms control treaty to the US and Russia.

SLBMs, launched from submarines, allow for a greater chance of survival from a first strike, giving the commander a second-strike capability.[1][3] Some long-range submarine-launched cruise missiles are counted towards triad status; this was the first type of submarine-launched strategic second-strike nuclear weapon before ballistic missile submarines became available. A SLBM is the most difficult to get accurate targeting for as it requires obtaining an accurate geographical fix to program targeting data to the missile, the total cost of a SLBM is increased by the cost of the submarine force, large crews. and deterrence patrols.[4]

Strategic bombers have greater flexibility in their deployment and weaponry. They can serve as both a first- and second-strike weapon. A bomber armed with AGM-129 ACM missiles, for example, could be classified as a first-strike weapon. A number of bombers often with aerial refueling aircraft kept at safe points would constitute a second-strike weapon.[1][3] In some strategic contexts either with nearby potential enemies or with forward basing lighter aircraft can be used on the strategic level as either a first-strike weapon or if dispersed at small airfields or aboard an aircraft carrier can reasonably avoid a counterstrike giving them regional second-strike capacity, aircraft such as the Mirage 2000, F-15E, A-5 Vigilante, Sea Harrier, or FB-111 are or were tasked part or full-time with land or sea-based strategic nuclear attack missions. 

An aerial refueling fleet supports intercontinental strategic operations both for heavy bombers and smaller aircraft; it also makes possible around the clock airborne standby of bombers and command aircraft making these airborne assets nearly impossible to eliminate in a first strike. Bomber airborne alert patrols are very expensive in terms of fuel and aircraft maintenance, even non-airborne alert basing requires both crew training hours and aircraft upkeep.[4]

Tactical nuclear weapons are used in air, land and sea warfare. Air-to-air missiles and rockets, surface-to-air missiles, and small air-to-ground rockets, bombs, and precision munitions have been developed and deployed with nuclear warheads. Ground forces have included tactical nuclear artillery shells, surface-to-surface rockets, land mines, medium and small man-packable nuclear engineering demolition charges, even man-carried or vehicle-mounted recoilless rifles. Naval forces have carried nuclear-armed naval rocket-assisted and standard depth charges and torpedoes, and naval gunnery shells. Tactical nuclear weapons and the doctrine for their use is primarily for use in a non-strategic warfighting role destroying military forces in the battle area; they are not counted toward triad status despite the possibility of many of these systems being usable as strategic weapons depending on the target.

“Darkness cannot drive out darkness, only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.”  Martin Luther King, Jr.

THE BASIC UNDERLYING FALLACY AND FALSE LOGIC OF THE TRIAD


There is a way of military thinking that if one nuclear weapons system that can destroy the whole world and kill everyone in it is good, then THREE nuclear weapons systems that can do the same thing, must be better. Let's have a backup to a backup, and then another backup of ways that all destroy the world and kill everyone on Earth, all of them on hair trigger alert. Really? 

Why do we need to have MULTIPLE ways to destroy Earth and kill everyone, when just ONE system is overkill and unlogical. Each nuclear armed nation has enough nuclear weapons to destroy the world many times over already. This is the first reason why the TRIAD theory consists of false logic. 
Dr. Helen Caldicott MD On Nuclear Weapons, MAD/Nuclear Armageddon
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/dr-helen-caldicott-md-on-nuclear.html

Remember that if ANY nation uses JUST ONE nuclear weapon to vaporize a city with a nuclear power plant in it, the world has basically ended and life will become extinct. Why? Every nuclear plant is loaded with highly radioactive fuel rods, and a nearby spent fuel pool is open to the sky and unshielded. That spent fuel pool contains enough spent fuel rods to destroy the whole world if vaporized by a nuclear weapon. More details at;

Inside The Doomsday Plane; Who Will Survive A (MAD) Global Nuclear War? via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/06/inside-doomsday-plane-who-will-survive.html

Nuclear Winter - Consequence Of Nuclear War
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/08/nuclear-winter-consequence-of-nuclear.html

“You may murder the liar, but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth. You may murder the hater, but you do not murder hate, nor establish love. Returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

GLOBAL ZERO AND DEBATE ABOUT SPENDING 1 TRILLION TO 'MODERNIZE' THE TRIAD SYSTEM

These modernization plans are unrealistic and unaffordable. Nuclear weapons spending is already at a record high, exceeding spending from the height of the Cold War when the United States had six times as many weapons. And these are weapons that do not address present day security challenges. Our nuclear arsenal does nothing to deter cyber attacks or terrorists, the latter a topic that dominated the debate.

The candidates also debated the merits of the no-fly zone over Syria. Several of them said they would be prepared to shoot down Russian military planes if Russia violated such a zone, referencing the recent downing of a Russian warplane over the Turkey-Syria border. But absent from this entire conversation -- candidates declaring they were prepared to intentionally escalate tensions between the United States and Russia -- was an acknowledgement of the almost 2,000 nuclear weapons on high alert that raise the stakes in U.S.-Russian brinksmanship to unimaginable levels.

These weapons are armed, fueled, targeted and ready to launch at a moment’s notice. A military encounter between the U.S. and Russia like the one the candidates seemed happy to risk could set in motion a crisis scenario that could result in the launch of nuclear weapons. All the presidential candidates should call on the current U.S. administration and Russia to work together to take urgent steps to get their nuclear weapons off of hair-trigger alert.- See more at: http://www.globalzero.org/blog/gopdebate-what-you-need-know#sthash.kZ9qZHqs.dpuf

"A standing military force, with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defense against foreign danger, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home." - James Madison

Dr. Ben Carson sparked a discussion about the United States’ nuclear arsenal when he brought up the state of its aging nuclear delivery systems, also known as the “nuclear triad.” Dr. Carson and Senator Marco Rubio made the case for modernizing U.S. nuclear arsenals. In response to a question from a Global Zero activist just one day after the debate, Senator Rubio said he would “absolutely” spend the $1 trillion it would take to modernize the nuclear triad, according the Congressional Budget Office. 

President Obama Promotes Nuclear Industry, Nuclear Weapons, 1 Trillion In New Funding, Results In New WMD Arms Race, Nuclear Plant Renaissance Scam, Clinton Warned Staff Of Fukushima Radiation
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/06/president-obama-all-of-above-strategy.html

Hillary Clinton also supports spending another Trillion on nuclear weapons, as do other Democrats. Vote for someone who will dismantle this broken, obsolete system, not someone who will fund it further.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex.

President Eisenhower, Farewell Address, Jan. 17, 1961


7.5 TRILLION Spent So Far In USA On Nuclear Weapons, Plus 40 - 60 Million Deaths Globally, Consists Of A Theft From 7 Future Generations, Livermore Released 1 Million Curies Radiation

NUCLEAR SUBS ACTUALLY INCREASE THE RISK AND DANGER OF MAD GLOBAL NUCLEAR ANNIHILATION, GLOBAL WARMING, CLIMATE CHANGE AND MAGNIFY SOCIAL PROBLEMS


Stop the renewal of the UK's Trident missile system, scheduled for 2016. For more info, and to sign the petition, please visit http://bit.ly/2INohVy

buzzabout It's so obvious! It's nigh on impossible to comprehend why anyone would want to waste billions to renew an unusable, outmoded WMD such as Trident and provoke the further proliferation of an insane arms race with potential for mutually assured destruction. It feels like our lives are in the hands of maladjusted little boys with incredibly dangerous toys. Anybody who would consider even threatening to push the button, under any circumstance, to annihilate millions of innocent people, animals and vast swathes of the planet's ecosystems, radioactively contaminating land, sea and air (which knows no borders) for many years to come, should NEVER be allowed in a position to do so - for they are of unsound mind.

Phantom; Rogue Nuclear Submarine, Rogue Nuclear Missile, Rogue Nuclear Bomb Crew
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/11/rogue-nuclear-submarine-rogue-nuclear.html

Soviet Nuclear Sub Almost Started Global Nuclear War in 1962; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/03/nuclear-sub-almost-started-global.html

USS Liberty Incident; 3 Minutes Away From All Out Nuclear WWIII; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/11/uss-liberty-incident-3-minutes-away.html

The Man Who Saved the World From Global Nuclear War (MAD): Free Full Movie
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-man-who-saved-world-from-global.html

US IS ESCALATING NUCLEAR WAR TENSIONS WITH TEST FIRING OF ICBM'S AND DECLARING TO WORLD; WE ARE READY TO USE THEM ANYTIME, AS A FIRST STRIKE WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION


ZEROHEDGE: Caught On Tape: U.S. Test Fires Nuclear ICBM, Warns "We Are Prepared To Use Nuclear Weapons"
....What was more disturbing than the actual launch, however, was the rhetoric behind it: instead of passing it off as another routine test, and letting US "adversaries" make up their own mind about what is going on, Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work, who witnessed the launch, said the U.S. tests, conducted at least 15 times since January 2011, send a message to strategic rivals like Russia, China and North Korea that Washington has an effective nuclear arsenal. "That’s exactly why we do this," Work told reporters before the launch.

Of course, the #1 unspoken rule when launching ICBMs is to never explicitly say why you are doing it. By breaking said rule, it marks a much greater escalation in international diplomacy than merely test firing the nuclear-capable ballistic missile. That, however, was not an issue and Work piled on, with the following stunner

"We and the Russians and the Chinese routinely do test shots to prove that the operational missiles that we have are reliable.And that is a signal ... that we are prepared to use nuclear weapons in defense of our country if necessary
more at;

ICBM missiles are hiding in silos in several US states, with people sitting at controls, ready to send them off to destroy whole nations at the order of any US President or other designated 'officials' in the military industrial complex. There are so many nuclear weapons and so many ways of delivering them, that the ICBM complex is entirely obsolete and useless. Between the subs, bombers and new hypersonic ship launched nuclear missiles, ICBM's are worthless at this point. The world is basically being held hostage by thousands of nuclear missiles pointed at them, along with a first strike policy that can and does include the use of nuclear weapons, for NO REASON at all. 

First Strike Policy And The Samson Principle; Holding The World Hostage With Nuclear, Chemical, Biological Weapons Of Mass Destruction; In The US, It Only Takes ONE Guy To Start A War
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/05/the-samson-principle-holding-world.html

First Strike Policy; How President Obama Has Moved World Closer To Global Nuclear War (MAD) By Refusing To Reduce US Nuclear Arsenal
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/08/how-president-obama-has-moved-us-closer.html

WHEN THERE ARE NO MORE NUCLEAR WEAPONS, THEN THERE IS NO NEED FOR A NUCLEAR TRIAD, MUCH LESS ANY NUCLEAR WEAPONS


This alleged counter-productive consequence of Global Zero – which has been put forward by opponents of Global Zero in Washington – has been roundly rejected by all of the current leaders of all of the major countries in question – leaders from Japan, Germany, and elsewhere who have re-stated their longstanding support for the total elimination of nuclear weapons. They generally subscribe to the view that the only purpose of nuclear weapons is to deter nuclear attack by others, and that universal Global Zero would therefore remove the last remaining rationale for keeping these weapons. - See more at: http://www.globalzero.org/get-the-facts/FAQs#sthash.7Msd9ePs.dpuf

THERE IS NO LOGICAL REASON FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS EITHER; THEY ARE EXPENSIVE, TOXIC, DANGEROUS, GLOBAL WARMING AND THREATEN ALL LIFE ON THE PLANET



When all nuclear weapons are banned and dismantled via a verification process and no more nuclear fuel is being created because all nuclear plants are closed down and the spent fuel is removed, then there is no more reason for a nuclear triad, correct?

List Of Countries And Nations With NO Nuclear Power Plants Is Growing; Decline of Nuclear Power And Nuclear Weapons Global Analysis And Report
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/list-of-countries-closing-down-all.html

John Quiggan; Nuclear Power Is TOO EXPENSIVE; Plus Dirty, Dangerous, Global Warming And Toxic, Even More So AFTER Decommissioning
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/10/nuclear-power-expensive-dirty-dangerous.html

Super Solar Storm To Hit Earth; 'Carrington Effect'; 400 Nuke Plants Will Melt Down/Explode
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/03/super-solar-storm-predicted-to-hit-2013.html

List Of 180 Abandoned, Cancelled Or Unfinished Nuclear Power Plants Globally - Worldwide Loss And Wasting of TRILLIONS Of Dollars, D.O.E to announce ENTIRE NUCLEAR Experiment a GIANT FAILURE
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/12/abandoned-nuclear-powerplants-worldwide.html

rogerthat February 25, 2016 The End of the Nuclear Age
BY KLAUS STRATMANN
Even before the Fukishima disaster, it was clear that nuclear power was dangerous, unreliable and too risky for civil use. The growth of renewable energy is now rendering them obsolete, argues Handelsblatt's energy expert.
https://global.handelsblatt.com/edition/375/ressort/opinion/article/end-of-the-nuclear-age


THE DEATH KNELL OF NUCLEAR POWER 

The nuclear power industry is dead on arrival, and has no future. Here are all of the reasons why....

Global Decline Of Nuclear Energy - New Renewable Energy Production Outpaces Nuclear
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/07/amory-lovins-global-decline-of-nuclear.html

Global Decline Of Nuclear Energy From 17 Percent In 1993 To 1.9 Percent Globally In 2016 - New Renewable Energy Production Now Outpaces Nuclear And Is Cheaper Than Coal Or Nuclear Power
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/07/amory-lovins-global-decline-of-nuclear.html

5 Reasons Why Nuclear Energy Is A Dead End Technology, by Jeremy Rifkin - Advisor To Heads Of State Around The World
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/04/5-reasons-why-nuclear-energy-is-dead.html

NON PROLIFERATION TREATY PROHIBITS NON NUCLEAR NATIONS FROM DEVELOPING NUCLEAR WEAPONS


Right now the Nonproliferation Treaty prohibits the nations that belong to it from developing nuclear weapons if they don’t already have them. But if this treaty falls apart some time in the future, nations with nuclear technology already in place will be able to develop nuclear weapons quickly. And the treaty permits nations to withdraw from it, as North Korea has already done. So if a nation decides to use its “peaceful” nuclear technologies to develop nuclear weapons, it can withdraw from the Nonproliferation treaty.
http://www.citizen-times.com/story/opinion/contributors/2015/05/29/two-connections-nuclear-power-nuclear-weapons/28166479/

The US oddly enough has never ratified the treaty. Why not?

President Kennedy Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Speech, Both Kennedy And Clinton Signed It, But US Senate Still Has Not Ratified This Treaty, Why Not?
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/06/president-kennedy-nuclear-test-ban.html


2,400 GLOBAL NUCLEAR BOMB TESTS EQUIVALENT TO NUCLEAR WAR, WITH MILLIONS OF RADIATION CONTAMINATION VICTIMS AND 40-60 MILLION DEATHS SO FAR

The world is already suffering in a massive way from deaths, cancers and genetic diseases due to the 2,400 nuclear bombs set off already. Why increase the suffering for present and future generations even further? 

2400 Global Nuclear Atmospheric Bomb Tests 1945-1998 - Equivalent to Global Nuclear War
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/nuclear-atmospheric-bomb-testing-1945.html

40 - 60 MILLION Deaths Due To Global Open Air Nuclear Weapons Testing 1945 to 2003 
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/04/40-60-million-deaths-due-to-global-open.html

IT IS TIME TO BAN ALL NUCLEAR BOMBS, THE US IS THE ONLY NATION STANDING IN THE WAY OF THIS DUE TO PARANOID FEAR AND THE POWER OF THE US MILITARY WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX


It is time to ban the bomb. http://www.facebook.com/icanw.org


“The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it.
Martin Luther King, Jr.

Ban All Nuclear Weapons Globally! 180 Nations Voted To Ban All Nuclear Weapons At United Nations, US Voted No
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/12/ban-all-nuclear-weapons-globally-180.html

THIS IS THE AGE OF TRANSFORMATION; LET'S CREATE A WORLD THAT WORKS FOR EVERYONE, FREE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS


Oscar-nominated actress Naomi Watts and former CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson have joined forces in asking leaders in Washington to cut nukes, not things that matter most -- like education.

Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.
This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children...
This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron. 
President Eisenhower

WHAT YOU CAN DO


Sign the petition at http://cutnukes.globalzero.org

Learn about ways to create a planet that works for everyone... and does not harm 7 future generations.

7 Generations Zero Harm Project; Environment, Carbon Footprint, Holistic Living, Zero Point, Renewable Energy, Energy Storage, Housing, Zero Nuclear, Zero Carbon, Zero Waste, Zero Chemicals
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/natural-health-drugs-medicine.html

WHAT YOU CAN DO; SUE THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY FOR VIOLATING COMMERCE CLAUSE AND HARMING HEALTH OF COMMUNITIES


Florida Power and Light Co. and Duke Energy Florida have been hit with a class-action lawsuit alleging that millions of dollars in nuclear construction costs the companies charge their customers are unlawful, the suit filed Monday by consumer rights law firm Hagens Berman says.

The suit filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida still has to be certified by a court. It accuses Duke Energy and FPL of overcharging through alleged unconstitutional price hikes that increase customers’ electricity bills to fund nuclear plant projects.

Since 2008, the Florida Public Service Commission has authorized the two utilities to collect more than $2 billion in nuclear costs from customers. The lawsuit alleges that Florida’s nuclear cost recovery system violates the Commerce Clause and is preempted by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and the Energy Policy Act of 2005 under the Supremacy Clause. …

More on lawsuits against the nuclear industry here....

Art, Aging, Poetry, Lyrics And Lawsuits Project; Lawsuits, Aging Nuclear Reactors, Recertification, Music, Lyrics, Poetry
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/nuclear-reactor-recertification.html

Without any nuclear plants making nuclear bomb fuel, nuclear bombs can not be built. It will be easier to dismantle existing nuclear bombs with no operating nuclear facilities that release invisible heavy metal radioactive poisons into the surrounding communities.
Indeed, I think that people want peace so much that one of these days governments had better get out of the way and let them have it. President Eisenhower

DONATE, SHARE, FOLLOW

Please help AGRP get this news out... thanks for your generous and very appreciated support! What you support grows and expands. What you withhold support from shrinks, shrivels and disappears. Even .50 cents per month is a great help. What is teaching the science of sustainable health worth?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGRP Facebook Discussion Group - Facebook Daily News Page - Linkedin
Smartphone App - RSS Feed - Index
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Green Road Project; Teaching the Science of Sustainable Health. Keep asking - what works for 7 future generations without causing harm? Support AGRP and share this page; Twitter, Facebook, Email, Tumbler, Reddit, Stumbleupon, Google+, and on Buffer

"Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, "ALLOWANCES ARE MADE FOR FAIR USE" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute, that otherwise might be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." For more info go to:http://bit.ly/2HVdEPp. Copyright protected material on this website is used in accordance with 'Fair Use', for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis, and will be removed at the request of the copyright owner(s). Please read Notice and Procedure for Making Claims of Copyright Infringement.

End

A Nuclear Triad Is Obsolete In The Age Of Transformation; The False Logic Is That Nuclear Weapons, Missiles, Or Bombs Somehow Protect Anyone From Anything - This Is The End Of The Toxic Heavy Metal Poison Nuclear Age
http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2016/02/a-nuclear-triad-is-obsolete-in-age-of.html

Website and contact page

Index, Table Of Contents

A Green Road Project - Science Of Sustainable Health Open Source Commons Knowledge Database
- Click in search box in upper right corner and type in search term to find any related article(s)

Share this page; Twitter, Facebook, Email, Tumbler, Reddit, Stumbleupon, Google+, and on Buffer

Related Posts

There is no other posts in this category.
Subscribe Our Newsletter
About Us Contact Us Terms Of Service Privacy Policy Sitemap